Skip to main content
RealTime Wire

Iran Opens Door to Indirect Talks Following Trump's Letter on Nuclear Program

Tehran responds to President Trump's invitation for negotiations, signaling a potential path for indirect dialogue concerning its nuclear ambitions.

By Farnaz FassihiSource: nytimes.com1 min read
Iran Opens Door to Indirect Talks Following Trump's Letter on Nuclear Program
Image via nytimes.com

In brief

Iran's foreign minister indicated a willingness for indirect negotiations with the U.S. while standing firm against direct talks under pressure from sanctions and military threats.

Iran has conveyed a cautious response to President Trump’s invitation for direct negotiations over its nuclear program, neither flatly rejecting the proposal nor agreeing to meet face-to-face. In a statement made on Thursday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi articulated that the nation maintains a policy against direct negotiations amid what they deem a "maximum pressure" strategy from the United States.Top foreign policy adviser Kamal Kharazi emphasized that the Islamic Republic remains open to the possibility of indirect talks. This comes after Iran sent a written reply to Trump’s letter via Oman. “We have not closed all doors,” Kharazi stated, indicating that the channels for communication remain somewhat open, albeit under strictly controlled conditions.Despite no formal diplomatic ties since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran has historically engaged in both direct and indirect discussions with the U.S. on matters ranging from its nuclear program to regional conflicts and detainee exchanges. Araghchi outlined that Iran has forwarded a comprehensive perspective on Trump's points along with the broader situation in the Middle East. He reiterated that “while there is maximum pressure and threats of military strikes, we will not negotiate directly. However, indirect negotiations can take place as they have previously.”With tensions high and the U.S. maintaining its tough stance against Iran, the prospect of any diplomatic resolution remains uncertain. Both parties could be navigating a complex landscape of deterrents and potential openings as they grapple with long-standing grievances and security concerns.

Topics

More on this story